Category: Essays
-
What Is Addiction? A Philosophical Definition
Toward a Structural Understanding of Compulsion Introduction Most definitions of addiction describe what it looks like: repeated use despite consequences, loss of control, craving, tolerance. These descriptions are clinically useful, but they leave the central question untouched. They tell us how addiction behaves without explaining why it becomes necessary. A philosophical definition must go further….
-
Why Treatment Must Not Promise What History Has Withdrawn
The Stories Treatment Tells Treatment, in every age, speaks in the language its civilization permits. In societies governed by sacred cosmologies, healing was framed as restoration to divine order. In moralistic cultures, it was framed as repentance. In early medical modernity, it was framed as correction of pathology. Each of these frameworks rested upon a…
-
Recovery After Metaphysics
Why Sobriety Is Not a Return but a Refusal The World After Certainty Any serious account of recovery must begin not with the individual but with history. The modern person does not suffer in the same symbolic universe that shaped premodern understandings of illness, sin, or transformation. The frameworks that once rendered suffering intelligible—cosmic teleology,…
-
Addiction as Civilizational Self-Medication
Postwar Consciousness, Metaphysical Disillusionment, and the Structure of Modern Suffering The differences between postwar Europe and postwar America are often described in political, economic, or institutional terms. Europe is said to be regulatory, cautious, and bureaucratic; America is described as dynamic, expansionary, and growth-driven. Such descriptions, while empirically accurate, remain superficial if they are not…
-
From Metaphysical Confidence to Civilizational Regulation
World War II and the Psychological Structure of Late Modernity The Second World War is typically narrated as geopolitical rupture, technological watershed, or moral catastrophe. Yet these descriptions, though accurate, fail to capture its deeper transformation: the war marked the irreversible reorganization of Western cultural psychology. It did not simply rearrange states; it altered the…
-
Let Endurance Have Its Full Effect: The Ethical Remainder as a Clinical Principle
In the Epistle of James, endurance is not presented as a virtue among others, nor as a means toward tranquility, insight, or salvation. It is presented as an ethical demand whose consequence is transformation rather than relief. “Let endurance have its full effect,” James writes, “so that you may be mature and complete, lacking in…
-
From Daimōn to Dopamine
A historical bridge for speaking about “spirits” in the language of modernity—without reducing them to metaphors Modernity’s reflex is to translate spirit into “hallucination,” “projection,” or “symbol,” and then congratulate itself for maturity. But that move is less enlightenment than evasion. It tries to solve the problem of agency by denying agency. What we actually…
-
Pharmakia, Spirits, and the Modern Refusal of Agency
Modernity’s reflex response to experiences traditionally described as encounters with spirits is to dissolve them into metaphor. Spirits, we are told, are merely hallucinations, projections, or symbolic representations of unconscious material. This move appears sophisticated, but it fails both historically and clinically. It explains nothing about the autonomy of such experiences, nothing about their coercive…
-
When Drugs Conjure Spirits
Translating Possession into the Language of Modernity Modernity prides itself on having abolished spirits. Drugs, we are told, do not summon daemons; they merely alter neurochemistry. Visions are hallucinations, voices are symptoms, agency dissolves into mechanism. And yet the lived experience of intoxication—especially in its extreme or chronic forms—stubbornly refuses this demystification. Users do not…
-
“Better Just to Kill Him”
Dignity, Endurance, and the Ethics That Remain “I’m just saying, no way to treat a man. Take away his dignity like that. Ain’t right. Better just to kill him.” This line—spoken by Patrick Crump in “Drive” (Season 6) of The X-Files—is not a moment of despair. It is a moral judgment. Crump is not asking…