A Second Look
Mike Flanagan’s Midnight Mass is often received as a religious horror story—a cautionary tale about fanaticism, blind faith, or the dangers of belief taken too far. Such readings remain trapped within a moral frame the series itself quietly abandons. Midnight Mass is not about the corruption of religion but about what religion becomes after it has historically succeeded. It stages, with remarkable precision, the condition of modernity after transcendence has completed its work and relocated itself into operational, biological, and chemical forms. Read in this light, the series belongs less to the genre of supernatural horror than to a genealogy of addiction, obligation, and endurance.
The show inherits its deepest structure from Bram Stoker’s Dracula, yet it reverses its metaphysical logic. In Stoker’s novel, the vampire is a foreign intrusion—an archaic excess that threatens a still-operative Christian symbolic order. Evil arrives from the outside, and salvation consists in recognition, coordination, and expulsion. Christianity works in Dracula: sacrament protects, symbols bind, and reason allies with faith to restore moral order. The vampire can be named, hunted, and destroyed because transcendence still functions symbolically and ritually.
In Midnight Mass, the vampire does not arrive as an enemy of Christianity but as its fulfillment. The creature is not expelled; it is welcomed, interpreted, and sacramentalized. Father Paul does not misrecognize the monster despite evidence; he recognizes it too well. He names it an angel. This naming is not delusional in a simple psychological sense. It is historically faithful. Angels, in biblical tradition, are not moral symbols but operational messengers—beings whose authority lies in efficacy rather than explanation. What changes in Midnight Mass is not belief but the form transcendence now takes.
The angel no longer mediates meaning. It produces effects. It regenerates tissue, reverses aging, abolishes illness, and confers immortality. Transcendence no longer speaks; it administers. This shift mirrors precisely the historical movement we recognize in modern addiction. Where symbolic mediation collapses, certainty reappears in chemical form. Grace becomes dosage. Salvation becomes compliance. The Eucharist ceases to function as a symbolic participation in divine life and becomes instead a pharmacological intervention. Belief is no longer required; repetition is.
This is why Midnight Mass is not ultimately a story about faith gone wrong. It is a story about faith functioning too well under conditions where meaning can no longer be sustained. Scofield-era Christianity already anticipates this transformation: eschatology without transcendence, resurrection without judgment, salvation as outcome rather than encounter. The biological resurrection offered in Midnight Mass is not a parody of Christian hope but its literalization. Bodies rise. Death is reversed. Eternal life is delivered. What disappears is not miracle but meaning.
Father Paul is therefore not a villain in the conventional sense. He is not corrupt, cynical, or power-hungry. He is historically sincere. His tragedy lies in his inability to endure finitude without substitution. Faced with the ethical demand of mortality—his own and that of his community—he chooses certainty over obligation. If salvation is real, he assumes, it must work. This assumption is not heretical; it is modern. It is the same logic that animates addiction, technological solutionism, and therapeutic absolutism alike. The demand is no longer for truth but for results.
Against this logic stands Riley, the only character who understands the condition without illusion. His sobriety is not redemptive in the conventional sense. It offers no meaning, no consolation, no metaphysical reward. It is endurance. Riley refuses the vampiric resurrection not because he fears death but because he refuses substitution. He will not exchange consciousness for certainty, obligation for relief. His final act—choosing death without promise or explanation—is the only genuinely ethical act in the series. It embodies what we have elsewhere named Born Man: a form of subjectivity defined by obligation without transcendence and responsibility without guarantee.
The collapse of the community in Midnight Mass is therefore not accidental or avoidable. Unlike in Dracula, there is no longer an outside from which evil arrives. The absolute has become immanent. Once Christianity becomes a delivery system, nothing internal can interrupt it. Confession accelerates violence. Hymns accompany slaughter. Apocalypse unfolds through obedience rather than rebellion. The horror is not that belief blinds, but that belief no longer matters.
What Midnight Mass ultimately diagnoses is the fate of religion in a technological civilization. Faith does not disappear; it survives as addiction. Transcendence does not vanish; it relocates into biology, chemistry, and technique. The problem is not unbelief but certainty without meaning. In such a world, the ethical task can no longer be salvation, recovery, or restoration. It can only be endurance: the capacity to remain conscious, responsible, and present without substitutes.
The true terror of Midnight Mass is therefore not the absence of God. It is that God works perfectly—without meaning, without judgment, and without mercy.
Brenton L. Delp MFT
Leave a Reply